Speaking to foreign correspondents, Olmert said he wouldn’t have agreed to a settlement freeze in the first place, saying it was more important to focus on larger issues like final borders, the fate of Palestinian refugees and the status of Jerusalem. But he said he would not turn down a request from Israel’s closest ally and endanger ties.
“If someone says that he agrees to 10 months of freezing and the president of the mightiest nation on earth and friendliest nation to Israel comes to you and says ‘please give me two (more) months, only two months,’ I mean what could happen in two months?” he said. “I would say ‘president, why two? Why not three? Take three!”
Olmert has confirmed he made Israel’s most far-reaching offer to the Palestinians, proposing a Palestinian state on close to 94% of the West Bank, and offering them the equivalent of the final 6% of territory in a land swap.Olmert said the Palestinians never responded to his offer, made in the final months of his term in office.
The Olmert plan would have also have turned over Arab neighborhoods in east Jerusalem to Palestinian control. Jerusalem’s Old City, with its holy sites, one of the most intractable issues dividing the sides, was to be governed jointly by Israel, the Palestinians, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the United States, he said.